Consequent Encroachment (CE) — Precision FVG Midpoint Guide 2025
- Published On: 09/12/2025
Join Our Telegram Channel
Consequent Encroachment (CE) is one of the simplest yet most misunderstood tools in
ICT price delivery. Many traders hear the term, mark the midpoint of a Fair Value Gap,
and assume that’s all it means. But CE is far deeper than a basic midpoint — it is a
precision mechanism that reveals the true intention behind displacement and highlights
the exact level where smart money is most likely to react.
Think of CE as the heartbeat inside every FVG. While the Fair Value Gap shows
market imbalance, CE identifies the internal point that the algorithm must revisit
to maintain efficient delivery. It is the level where price restores balance, even if the
entire FVG never gets filled.
When you understand CE as the decision point inside an imbalance, the charts stop looking
random. You start seeing:
CE is powerful because it:
While many ICT traders focus only on FVG fills, professionals study the midpoint — because CE
often reacts even when the rest of the gap does not. A clean
Displacement → FVG → CE retest is one of the strongest signals in market structure.
It represents the moment where inefficiency meets balance, where smart money confirms direction,
and where high-probability trades quietly begin.
To understand Consequent Encroachment (CE) deeply, you must first understand the
logic of imbalance. A Fair Value Gap (FVG) forms when price moves so aggressively
that the opposing side cannot respond, leaving behind a zone of inefficiency — an area where
no real trading occurred.
But here’s the key insight that most traders miss:
The algorithm does not always need to fill the entire imbalance.
It only needs to rebalance price to the midpoint — the CE. This midpoint acts as the
minimum requirement for restoring efficiency inside displacement.
Every FVG is defined by three candles:
CE is simply the midpoint between Candle 1’s wick and Candle 3’s wick.
It visually splits the imbalance into two equal halves — but more importantly, it identifies
the point where the algorithm considers the move “half-balanced.”
This is why you will often notice:
These reactions are not random — they reflect programmed behavior.
Many traders expect the entire FVG to be filled, but ICT teaches something more important:
The algorithm seeks efficiency, not perfection.
Full FVG fills occur only when the narrative requires a deeper mitigation, such as:
But minimum efficiency happens at CE. So price frequently:
Smart money uses CE as a recalibration level, not a full reset point.
During displacement, institutions leave behind unfilled orders. CE marks the price level where:
This makes CE:
Even in powerful trends, price often taps CE because inefficiency must be corrected
before the algorithm can deliver to the next liquidity objective.
CE is also an orderflow diagnostic tool. The way price behaves around CE
reveals how strong the displacement truly was.
CE is not just a midpoint — it is the level where inefficiency becomes balance,
where displacement gets validated, and where institutional intent becomes visible.
Consequent Encroachment is one of ICT’s simplest tools to draw — yet also one of the
most commonly mis-marked. Many traders place CE on the wrong candles, the wrong gaps,
or even on imbalances that are not true FVGs. To use CE effectively, you must understand
which FVGs deserve a CE level and how to mark them with precision.
Before drawing CE, confirm you have a valid Fair Value Gap (FVG), not just a random space
between candles. A true FVG requires three candles:
The key requirement is:
Candle 2’s body must not overlap the wicks of Candle 1 and Candle 3.
This confirms that the market delivered an imbalance — a zone where the algorithm skipped repricing.
If there is no real imbalance, there is no CE.
Once the FVG is validated, marking CE is straightforward:
CE represents the minimum efficient repricing level the algorithm aims to reach during
a retracement. It is not based on candle bodies — ICT specifically uses the wicks, because
they mark the true boundaries of inefficiency.
CE reacts differently depending on the type and scale of the imbalance:
These form on lower timeframes. CE is usually hit quickly and provides small but precise reactions.
Great for scalping; less reliable for large swings.
These produce some of the strongest CE levels. Expect:
HTF CE levels act as major market magnets. Price may take days or weeks to reach them,
but when it does, reactions are powerful and often trend-defining.
These CE levels refine execution inside the HTF narrative. They are excellent for precise entries
and stop-loss optimization.
The larger and stronger the imbalance, the more powerful its CE reaction tends to be.
Not every gap deserves a CE line. Ignore imbalances created by:
CE only matters when the FVG is legitimate, displacement-driven, and part of a real narrative.
Once you learn to identify valid FVGs and mark CE with precision, your charts become clearer, cleaner,
and far more predictable.
One of the biggest misconceptions among beginners is believing that price must always
fully fill a Fair Value Gap (FVG). But ICT makes it clear: the algorithm does
not need to complete the entire gap. Instead, it often rebalances only to the
Consequent Encroachment (CE) — the midpoint of the imbalance.
This is why CE is one of the most reliable levels in Smart Money Concepts. It represents
the minimum efficient mitigation the algorithm must satisfy before continuing its narrative.
A common and highly predictable pattern looks like this:
This happens because:
Many traders lose waiting for a complete fill, while professionals enter confidently at CE —
because CE is the price level the market is most likely to respect.
A Fair Value Gap represents inefficiency — but the algorithm does not always correct all of it.
Instead, it often rebalances only to:
CE = 50% of the imbalance
This midpoint is the mathematically fair repricing level inside a displacement move.
In simple terms:
That is why CE provides more consistent reactions than the outer boundaries of the FVG.
CE is also a diagnostic tool. How price behaves at CE reveals the strength of institutional orderflow:
If price taps CE and explodes immediately:
If price violates CE with little resistance:
This makes CE an X-ray tool for analyzing orderflow quality.
The full FVG is wide, but CE is a
For example:
This makes CE one of ICT’s favorite entry refinement tools.
| Concept | Reliability | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Full FVG Fill | Medium | Full mitigation is optional and only occurs when the narrative requires deeper rebalancing. |
| CE (Consequent Encroachment) Tap | Very High | CE represents the minimum required rebalancing the algorithm must deliver. |
This is why CE often nails the exact turning point while traders waiting for a full FVG fill
are left behind. CE is the true precision level inside an imbalance — the level that
confirms displacement and triggers clean reactions.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) becomes incredibly powerful during trending markets.
While many traders only use CE for reversals, its true strength appears in
trend continuation setups.
When displacement forms an FVG inside an established trend, the CE midpoint becomes the ideal level
where institutions rebalance, reload positions, and continue delivering price.
Think of CE as the “trend engine” — the point where the algorithm pauses briefly
to breathe before accelerating again.
In a bullish trend, strong displacement creates bullish FVGs. Most beginners wait for a full FVG fill,
but price usually returns only to the CE level before launching upward.
Why CE holds so well in an uptrend:
Bullish continuation pattern:
This CE tap becomes a low-risk buy entry because price is still in
internal discount relative to the current trend leg.
Key bullish confirmation signs at CE:
When these align, CE acts as a launchpad for the next bullish expansion.
In bearish trends, displacement prints bearish FVGs. CE becomes the ideal level for
re-entering shorts because it marks the fair rebalancing point where institutions
can mitigate and add to positions.
Bearish continuation pattern:
Why institutions defend CE aggressively in downtrends:
Key bearish CE confirmations:
These signals mark CE as a high-precision short entry with minimal drawdown.
CE becomes significantly more accurate when combined with premium/discount logic.
| Trend | High-Probability CE Zone | Low-Probability CE Zone |
|---|---|---|
| Uptrend | CE inside Discount | CE in Premium |
| Downtrend | CE inside Premium | CE in Discount |
When CE aligns with the correct half of the dealing range, continuation becomes
highly probable.
Strong trends follow a predictable, rhythmic delivery cycle:
Displacement → FVG → CE Tap → Expansion → New FVG → New CE Tap
CE forms the center of each internal pullback, providing entries with:
When you master CE in trending conditions, you gain the ability to catch
every major leg of a trend with sniper-level accuracy.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) is not only a continuation tool — it is one of the
most precise reversal indicators in ICT theory. After liquidity is swept and displacement
appears in the opposite direction, CE becomes the first reliable level that confirms the new narrative.
Most traders misread reversals because they enter immediately after a sweep,
without waiting for displacement or CE. CE is the level that reveals
real institutional intent, not emotional volatility.
A legitimate ICT reversal always includes four key components:
CE is the proof that the reversal is real.
Price does not need to fully fill the FVG — a CE tap is enough to complete minimum algorithmic repricing.
A CHoCH alone is not a valid entry.
Beginners often enter too early by reacting to the CHoCH candle itself.
The correct approach:
This eliminates emotional entries and provides clean, low-risk reversal setups.
Why CE is the best first entry:
A CE tap after CHoCH often becomes the origin of a new dealing range.
When price respects CE after a liquidity sweep, it signals that:
Bullish reversal example:
Bearish reversal example:
This model repeats across every timeframe and every market.
Many reversals appear convincing but fail because:
CE solves this problem by acting as a confirmation level.
If CE rejects with momentum → the reversal is legitimate.
If CE breaks cleanly → the reversal was fake or premature.
This one filter alone eliminates most losing reversal attempts.
Because it follows pure institutional mechanics:
CE is the moment the algorithm finalizes the shift — the pivot between the old narrative and the new one.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) becomes even more powerful when combined with
Order Blocks (OBs).
On their own, OBs show where institutions entered.
CE shows how deeply the algorithm must rebalance before continuing.
When CE aligns with an OB, you get one of the
highest-probability entry zones in ICT methodology — a level where
displacement, institutional footprints, and algorithmic repricing intersect.
These are the trades known for extremely tight stops, clean reactions, and powerful follow-through.
A valid OB is not just the last candle before a move — it must cause
real displacement.
The complete sequence looks like this:
CE gives precision.
OB gives context.
Together they produce institutional-grade entries.
When CE sits inside the wick or body of an OB, it forms a stacked confluence:
This alignment tells you exactly:
These setups create:
They work so well because:
Many traders incorrectly place their stop-loss inside the OB,
which gets taken by normal mitigation wicks.
CE fixes this problem.
Proper SL placement process:
This keeps your SL outside the required rebalance zone while maintaining tight risk.
If displacement is genuine, price should NEVER violate CE.
When price returns to mitigate an OB, the behavior around CE reveals the strength of continuation.
Strong continuation signs:
Weak or failing signs:
CE gives you an early and accurate read on whether the mitigation is genuine or weak.
This combination unifies several ICT concepts into one powerful model:
This is the setup that gives traders:
This is the difference between trading “ICT concepts” and trading
institutional precision.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) becomes far more powerful when viewed through the lens of
liquidity.
Liquidity shows where stops are sitting.
CE shows where the algorithm must rebalance.
Together, they reveal one of the most predictable patterns in ICT price delivery:
➡️ Price grabs liquidity → rebalances to CE → continues in the intended direction.
This sequence appears across all markets and timeframes because it reflects how the algorithm
efficiently reprices imbalance.
Before the market can move efficiently, it first needs fuel.
That fuel comes from liquidity pools such as:
When price sweeps liquidity, two things occur:
Inside that imbalance lies CE — the midpoint the algorithm must rebalance.
Liquidity provides the energy. CE provides the destination.
This is why liquidity sweeps often precede perfect CE reactions.
After liquidity is taken, price almost always gravitates toward the CE of the FVG created by the sweep.
Why? Because the algorithm must efficiently reprice imbalance before continuing the narrative.
CE represents the minimum rebalancing required for:
This is why CE reactions are so clean — the market is simply completing its required rebalancing.
When price sweeps sell-side liquidity (SSL), it often triggers a bullish narrative:
Institutions accumulate below lows, and CE becomes the level where the algorithm:
Bullish CE reactions after SSL sweeps create some of ICT’s cleanest buy setups.
When price sweeps buy-side liquidity (BSL), the opposite occurs:
This shows institutional distribution at the highs, with CE acting as the midpoint where:
Bearish CE reactions after BSL sweeps are extremely reliable for reversals and continuations.
This sequence is the backbone of algorithmic price delivery:
This is not randomness — it is a repeating, programmable cycle:
Liquidity gives purpose.
Displacement gives direction.
CE gives precision.
Continuation gives delivery.
Once you internalize this sequence, the entire market becomes far more understandable.
Consequent Encroachment becomes extremely accurate when used across multiple
timeframes. Most traders only mark CE on the timeframe they’re trading — but Smart Money respects
HTF CE as major rebalancing points, while LTF CE levels provide
precise execution entries.
When both align, the market delivers some of the cleanest, most explosive movements
in all of ICT’s methodology.
On higher timeframes (Daily, 4H, 1H), imbalances reflect institutional-scale movements.
The midpoint of these imbalances — the HTF CE — becomes a major
algorithmic attraction point.
HTF CE often acts as:
HTF CE = macro draw on liquidity + required algorithmic repricing.
After identifying the macro direction from HTF CE, the LTF (15M, 5M, 1M) gives
precision entries through micro rebalancing.
LTF CE commonly appears:
LTF CE provides:
LTF CE = precision inside the institutional macro story.
The most powerful CE-based setups occur when a
HTF CE acts as the macro reversal or continuation zone AND
a LTF CE forms inside that zone.
This alignment creates a double algorithmic confluence:
Result → explosive bullish expansion
Result → strong bearish delivery
This is one of the most reliable multi-timeframe setups in ICT’s entire framework.
If HTF and LTF CE levels point in different directions, the market is likely:
For example:
In these cases:
Conflict = unclear narrative = low probability.
Multi-timeframe CE blends together:
It allows you to trade like a professional by entering with the trend, mitigating risk, and
timing entries to perfection.
Multi-timeframe CE turns the midpoint into a full institutional alignment model.
Consequent Encroachment isn’t just an entry refinement tool — it’s also one of the most
precise risk-management and profit-targeting mechanisms in ICT methodology.
Because CE represents the minimum mitigation level required by the algorithm, price
reacts around it with exceptional consistency.
This makes CE extremely valuable for:
Once you apply CE to SL/TP logic, trade quality and confidence increase dramatically.
Many traders expect the market to completely fill a Fair Value Gap. But ICT teaches that price
does not need to fill the entire imbalance — it only needs to rebalance to CE.
This is why stop-losses placed inside the FVG but above/below CE often get taken.
CE is the true reaction point — not the edges of the imbalance.
CE helps you tighten your stop-loss while keeping the setup high probability and structurally safe.
Because:
This protects you from:
SL outside the displacement origin = safe.
SL inside the FVG = risky.
CE is also one of the cleanest, most algorithmically aligned target levels for both continuation
and countertrend trades.
During trends, price frequently seeks the next CE created by the next FVG.
This produces a rhythmic delivery:
CE → continuation → new CE → continuation
If you are trading against the dominant trend, CE is often:
Countertrend TP should typically be the CE of the FVG that caused the previous impulse.
CE acts like a “truth detector.”
If displacement is backed by real institutional orderflow, CE will:
But if CE breaks decisively, it signals:
CE provides an X-ray of orderflow strength.
Instead of trailing stops behind random structure, you can trail behind successive CE levels.
Each CE acts as:
If CE holds → trend is strong.
If CE fails → trend is weakening.
CE levels inside new FVGs are excellent places to scale into winning positions because:
Stacking entries at each CE keeps your entire position aligned with institutional orderflow.
CE gives traders:
Order Blocks show where displacement begins.
FVGs show where imbalance happened.
CE shows the exact level price must respond to.
This makes CE one of the most reliable and overlooked tools in Smart Money risk management.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) is one of the most reliable refinement tools in ICT methodology —
but it is not infallible. When CE fails, it usually reveals an important flaw in
the underlying narrative:
Understanding CE failures is just as important as understanding CE reactions. Recognizing when CE
is likely to fail helps you avoid low-quality trades and prevents false confidence.
CE only holds when the displacement forming the FVG is genuine institutional movement. However,
many FVGs come from:
When displacement is weak, CE is often violated because:
Weak displacement = weak CE.
A proper FVG — and its CE — must be preceded by a liquidity event. This includes:
If liquidity was not taken, the move is incomplete. As a result:
CE without liquidity = fragile CE.
Asian session imbalances often produce unreliable CE levels because:
London Open frequently:
Asian CE is low probability unless aligned with HTF narrative.
Even a strong CE fails if positioned on the wrong side of the dealing range:
PD array context overrides CE reaction probability.
Equilibrium (50% midpoint of the dealing range) is the least predictable region. Inside equilibrium:
CE in equilibrium typically results in:
Thus CE here is not high probability.
In weak trends, CE may be:
When institutions are no longer defending displacement, CE becomes vulnerable.
Strong trend → CE holds
Weak trend → CE breaks
Sometimes the reason is simple: the algorithm wants to fill the entire imbalance.
Reasons include:
CE is the minimum rebalancing requirement —
but sometimes the market chooses the maximum.
CE failures teach the trader valuable information:
When CE holds → trend is healthy.
When CE fails → the deeper narrative is shifting.
Skilled ICT traders learn from both the reactions and the failures.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) becomes unstoppable when applied through
repeatable, rule-based setups. These models appear across all timeframes — from
1M scalps to Daily swing trades — because they tap directly into the algorithm’s core
behavior:
LIQUIDITY → DISPLACEMENT → IMBALANCE → CE → CONTINUATION
Master these three setups, and CE transforms from a simple midpoint into a
precision timing tool with exceptionally low-risk entries.
The gold-standard CE setup — used to catch the beginning of new trends.
Narrative example:
Sweep → CHoCH → Displacement → FVG → CE Tap → Expansion.
This model works inside existing trends to catch the continuation leg with precision.
Bullish narrative example:
BOS → Bullish FVG → CE Tap → Expansion toward next premium zone.
This is the multi-timeframe sniper setup — combining HTF narrative with LTF execution
precision.
Narrative example:
HTF CE Draw → LTF Sweep → CHoCH → LTF FVG → LTF CE → Expansion.
These setups give you:
Most traders mark CE as a simple line.
Professionals trade CE as a structured model.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) is not magic, and it’s not coincidence.
It is the mathematical center of inefficiency — the point the algorithm returns to
when price delivery becomes unbalanced.
To understand CE fully, you must understand why the algorithm respects it so consistently.
Once you see the logic, CE becomes predictable, intuitive, and extremely powerful.
Every Fair Value Gap represents inefficient price delivery — an area where buy and sell
orders did not transact evenly. The CE level (50% of the FVG) is the
minimum rebalancing point needed for:
The full FVG shows what was skipped.
CE shows what MUST be repaired.
Price may not fill the full gap, but it visits CE far more often because it satisfies
the algorithm’s requirement:
restore balance without reversing direction.
There are two kinds of rebalancing:
In strong trends, the algorithm prefers partial fills because full fills:
CE allows price to rebalance efficiently without losing trend direction, which is why CE
becomes the default mitigation level during:
CE is also a diagnostic tool revealing whether displacement was real or weak.
If price respects CE → displacement is strong.
If price violates CE but fills full FVG → displacement is moderate.
The trend may still continue, but retracement is deeper.
If price violates the entire FVG → displacement was weak or fake.
CE acts as a real-time strength indicator without indicators or lagging signals.
FVGs are symmetrical inefficiencies created by unidirectional orderflow.
The midpoint represents:
Because of this, CE acts like an algorithmic magnet:
It is the invisible line that equalizes imbalance.
CE sits at the intersection of:
When price taps CE, one of two things happens:
CE isn’t just a midpoint — it’s a decision point that reveals:
CE reflects the algorithm’s fundamental goals:
Every major displacement leaves behind an inefficiency footprint.
CE is the mathematical center of that footprint.
This explains why:
Once you understand CE through algo theory, you stop guessing — and start reading
the market exactly the way the algorithm delivers price.
Consequent Encroachment is one of the most precise tools in ICT’s entire model —
but only when it’s applied correctly. Most traders misuse CE not because they
misunderstand the concept, but because they apply it in the wrong context.
CE requires:
Without these elements, the CE level becomes unreliable.
Below are the most common mistakes traders make — and how to avoid them.
Not every imbalance qualifies for CE.
Weak FVGs form when:
If an FVG comes from corrective or choppy movement, its CE midpoint is meaningless.
Always ask: “Did real displacement create this FVG?”
If not → skip the CE.
CE only works when displacement reflects institutional intent.
CE is not an entry signal by itself. It is a refinement tool.
Before trading a CE tap, you must have:
Without displacement proving the imbalance is meaningful, CE becomes just another midpoint.
CE is valid only when displacement confirms intention.
CE works only when aligned with premium/discount logic.
CE inside equilibrium or opposite the HTF narrative is low probability and often violated.
Correct PD context makes CE accurate. Wrong context makes it fragile.
A CE rejection is not the same as a liquidity sweep.
A CE tap means:
A liquidity sweep means:
Sometimes price violates CE slightly to sweep micro liquidity — but context and
follow-through displacement reveal the true intent.
If price breaks CE and continues in the original direction → continuation.
If price breaks CE and displaces back through the range → reversal forming.
Your role isn’t prediction — it’s narrative interpretation.
This is the biggest mistake CE traders make.
CE is the macro refinement — CHoCH is the micro confirmation.
A CE tap means nothing unless the lower timeframe shows:
The safest execution model:
CE without LTF confirmation is prediction.
CE with LTF confirmation is precision.
When used correctly, CE becomes:
Avoiding these mistakes ensures CE reflects:
CE stops being “just a midpoint”
and becomes a surgical entry refinement system.
Consequent Encroachment becomes effortless only when your eyes learn to see it naturally —
inside real displacement, real FVGs, and real narrative structure. This short 10-minute drill
is designed to train your recognition fast, without overwhelming you.
Your goal is not to mark every imbalance.
Your goal is to train your brain to instantly recognize:
Do this drill daily for 7–10 days and CE will shift from a “concept” to an
instinctive pattern.
Start on any timeframe (recommended: 1H, 15M, 5M).
Scroll your chart and look only for strong displacement candles.
Displacement must include:
Weak displacement → weak FVG → weak CE.
This step trains you to recognize institutional aggression.
Every genuine displacement leaves behind an imbalance.
Mark only high-quality FVGs.
Avoid:
This step trains selection over clutter.
Once a valid FVG is found:
This midpoint is the CE — the algorithm’s minimum rebalancing level.
Before displacement there should be a clear liquidity event. Check whether price:
If liquidity preceded displacement → CE is high probability.
Liquidity + Displacement + CE = core ICT logic.
Scroll forward slowly and watch how price returns to CE.
Observe whether:
You are building instinct around CE reactions.
This step teaches precision and reality.
Ask:
A powerful truth emerges:
CE is respected far more often than the entire FVG.
Based on the reaction, refine the entry logic:
You’re not trying to take trades — you’re building recognition skill.
This drill develops the 4 core CE competencies:
Do this consistently and CE becomes part of how you think about price —
natural, instinctive, and precise.
Consequent Encroachment is not just another ICT tool — it is
the precision layer that reveals the true intention behind displacement.
Many traders learn FVGs, OBs, CHoCH, BOS, and liquidity sweeps, yet still struggle with:
CE is the missing piece — the midpoint that sits inside every true displacement, the level the algorithm
must revisit before continuing. It is the hidden magnet that the market respects far more
often than a full FVG fill.
Most beginners mark the whole FVG and pray for a return. But ICT teaches that the
midpoint — the CE — holds the algorithmic importance.
When you use CE for entries:
You stop trading random imbalances and start trading the
exact institutional footprint inside them.
Not all displacement is real. CE exposes the truth:
This transforms CE into a real-time displacement validator, helping you avoid fake moves
and trap imbalances.
Whether the market is:
CE quietly dictates the precise reaction level.
CE tells you:
It is the invisible line that organizes the entire narrative.
Retail traders react to candles.
CE traders react to intent.
Combine CE with:
…and the market becomes structured instead of chaotic.
Every retracement gains purpose.
Every reaction gains logic.
CE becomes the anchor point of algorithmic delivery.
Retail focuses on:
Institutions focus on:
CE is where unfinished algorithmic business remains.
Master CE, and you begin to read charts like Smart Money.
Consequent Encroachment is one of ICT’s simplest concepts — and one of the most powerful.
It helps you:
When you master CE, every ICT concept becomes clearer, sharper, and far more reliable.
CE is not a line — it is the key to understanding how the algorithm truly delivers price.
Consequent Encroachment (CE) is the 50% midpoint of a Fair Value Gap (FVG).
It represents the minimum level the algorithm must revisit when rebalancing inefficient price action.
CE refines entries, validates displacement, and reveals institutional intent.
CE is calculated using the midpoint between:
Formula:
CE = (Candle 1 Wick + Candle 3 Wick) / 2This midpoint becomes the most important reaction level inside an FVG.
Because price does not always fill the entire FVG —
but it almost always taps or reacts to CE.
CE is the algorithm’s:
Displacement remains valid if CE holds.
It weakens or fails if CE breaks.
No — but high-quality CE levels are tapped most of the time when:
Weak CE levels — such as those formed during news spikes, thin liquidity, or micro gaps — may be ignored.
Yes. CE typically fails when:
CE failure signals that institutional commitment is weak or absent.
CE works on all timeframes, but reliability increases with timeframe size.
The strongest setups occur when HTF CE aligns with LTF CE, OB, or FVG confluence.
Order Blocks create displacement → displacement creates FVG → FVG creates CE.
When CE lies inside an Order Block, it becomes:
OB + FVG + CE is one of the highest-probability ICT setups.
Yes. CE is often used as a protective stop-loss boundary.
If CE holds → displacement is intact.
If CE breaks → the setup is weakening or invalid.
This allows for:
Absolutely. CE reflects the algorithm’s fair rebalancing midpoint inside inefficient price delivery.
Price may not always fill the entire FVG, but it must address CE for efficiency.
This is why CE is respected across all markets, sessions, and timeframes.
Order Block Basics (ICT) — Smart Money OB Guide 2025
December 9, 2025
Consequent Encroachment (CE) — Precision FVG Midpoint Guide 2025
December 9, 2025
Premium vs Discount ICT — Smart Money Price Logic Explained 2025
December 7, 2025
Connect with focused ICT learners on our Telegram. Get daily insights, updates, and clear guidance to simplify your trading journey.
Join Channel